Masturbation: Ok lang daw?!?

viruzol_007 wrote:pAPA hARBY, Ang hirAp nAman Pag ANg IsAng lAlAke e Di Na MamASter-bit. , Ika pa papa Harby di ka Ba nag MaMasTErBate?

YES OR nO

viruzol_007 wrote:ay teka,,, papa harby bat tatlo na ang reputasyon mo.

ano yon? ............ gusto ko mayron din akong reputasyon.

Yidda wrote:

It would be more interesting if we defined first,1. What is morality 2. What determines the morality of an act? instead of going blind with the subject.

viruzol_007 wrote:eh asan ba yang dugz na yan..


Dhugzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, pakisagot na nga at nang mai-bulong na sa akin ni papa harby kung nag mamaster-bit ba sya o hindi.


asan na ba yong kulokoy na yon?

Ateo wrote:

Well, for starters, it is definitely not the Bible, or at least the Old Testament part of the Bible (70 percent of the book), where God tolerated child sacrifices, rape of captive women, flood-killing of children, and other less moral things.

And if the NT is a source of moral code, it is definitely ignored when it commanded women to be submissive to men, not to speak in the church and to cover their head. It is definitey ignored when it supported slavery and monarchies -- as we have since abolished slavery and preferred democracies.

If we talk about Biblical morality we have to play tinikling with biblical verses, picking one verse in Leviticus but ignoring other nearby verses.

The true source of our current moral laws are actually what society decides as moral. And, while subjectivity scares you guys, the fact is that morality is subjective. The morality in Pauline Rome or Constanstine Rome is different from our current morality. For example, blasphemy is allowed now under the Freedom of Speech principles. In the Bible, you are supposed to kill the blasphemer, but nobody does that now, he he he.

I hope this answers your question, Yidda.

Ateo wrote:

I think Dhugz should answer that question honestly and openly like a man. And if that thingy caused him to sin, he should -- as the Bible demands -- cut it off. "If your hand caused you to sin..." It is in the Bible.

Dhugz wrote:I

Pareng Dhugz pwede mo kaming bolahin ha pero hindi ang Ultimate Good

Ateo wrote:

Well, for starters, it is definitely not the Bible, or at least the Old Testament part of the Bible (70 percent of the book), where God tolerated child sacrifices, rape of captive women, flood-killing of children, and other less moral things.

And if the NT is a source of moral code, it is definitely ignored when it commanded women to be submissive to men, not to speak in the church and to cover their head. It is definitey ignored when it supported slavery and monarchies -- as we have since abolished slavery and preferred democracies.

If we talk about Biblical morality we have to play tinikling with biblical verses, picking one verse in Leviticus but ignoring other nearby verses.

The true source of our current moral laws are actually what society decides as moral. And, while subjectivity scares you guys, the fact is that morality is subjective. The morality in Pauline Rome or Constanstine Rome is different from our current morality. For example, blasphemy is allowed now under the Freedom of Speech principles. In the Bible, you are supposed to kill the blasphemer, but nobody does that now, he he he.

I hope this answers your question, Yidda.

The society decides what is moral?

Anong silbi ni Supreme Pasta Ateo, hindi niya ba alam kung ano ang tama at mali at ang nagdedecide ng tama at mali ang yung tao?

sakundes wrote:

the FSM is there to guide us.. not to DICTATE on matters of humankind ^_^

as for dhugz.. id say cut it off! it'd make a great coat hanger! hahahah ^_^

Ehem! si Dhugz hindi nakapag-masturbate since bata hanggang ngayon

harballah wrote:Hindi kaya maganda ay sumagot karin Freds kasi ako kahit tanong ito sa kristiyano ay sasagot ako pero dapat iyong pinatungkulan muna (kristiyano) ang sumagot muna he!he!he!

Ehem! si Dhugz hindi nakapag-masturbate since bata hanggang ngayon

Still, i'm not a saint

It's your time naman igan to make bulong here sa thread

fredms3 wrote:

Nagawa ko yan Harby noong panahon na hindi ko alam na itoy pambababoy sa katawan ipinahiram lang sa atin ni God. Subalit nung malamang ito ay di kaaya-aya sa paningin ng Diyos ay di ko na ginawa hanggang now and 'till then.

Still, i'm not a saint

It's your time naman igan to make bulong here sa thread

harballah wrote:

Thanks buddy, tulad ng nasabi ko na ibubulong ko sa iyo at kay virz siguro dito na lang sa thread mismo para sa ganoon ay hindi ako masabihan ng ipokrito kung sakali.

Tama ka buddy ako rin ay naranasan ko rin iyan noong kabataan ko kung saan malakas ang hatak ng pornograpiya kung saan nagkalat ang malalaswang babasahin at tulad mo rin ay kulang din ako sa kaalaman sa Islam tungkol sa bagay na iyan.

Nasagot ko na ba ang tanong mo buddy

form fredms3

Nagawa ko yan Harby noong panahon na hindi ko alam na itoy pambababoy sa katawan ipinahiram lang sa atin ni God.

from harballah

Tama ka buddy ako rin ay naranasan ko rin iyan noong kabataan ko kung
saan malakas ang hatak ng pornograpiya kung saan nagkalat ang
malalaswang babasahin at tulad mo rin ay kulang din ako sa kaalaman sa
Islam tungkol sa bagay na iyan.

Jewel wrote:




hoy hwag kayong madladlad dito, nagakakalat pa kayo ha - privatize nyo nalang yan mga broha heheheh

--- uu nga mag-confess ka na rin dito hehehehe

fredms3 wrote:Ayyyyyyyyyy...

Nabigla naman ako sa'yo Jewel...

Wag ka ng mahiya bro, magladlad ka narin.

--- uu nga mag-confess ka na rin dito hehehehe

Jewel wrote:

Sori mod fred bawal sa amin ang magladlad kasi kasama sa faith namin ang modesty.

Mas magandang pag-usapan ang moral na topic, anong mapapala nyo sa paglaladlad nyo ni imam harballah dito, goodness? hehhehe

Ang susunod na tanong nyan eh nasarapan ba kayo nung nagdyajakol kayo?

Di na kelangang sagutin Jewel yang ganyang tanong. Stressing the obvious na yan at kung halimbawang nasa harap ko yung magtatanong nyan ay malamang ------- Kurot ang aabutin nyan.