Sino ang huhusga at Papatay sa mga Disbeliever? Si Allah ba? O Muslim?

BibleBot wrote:eh bakit nga po we ang ginamit gayung ayun sa inyo eh iisa lang ang persona ng allah ninyo

not unless naniniwala kayo sa plural suffix

Hay naku common sense at dagdagan ng logic, ang linaw ng sabi ng Allah sa banal na Quran kaya huwag mong ikumpara sa aral ninyo kay Pablo, ang aral namin sa Quran ay siyang aral noong panahon ni Moses.

Chapter 112:


In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only;
2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;
3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;
4. And there is none like unto Him.

naku harballah ibig mo bang sabihin kinokontra mo na yung nakalagay sa surah na salitang we pantukoy sa inyong allah

akala ko ba begotten o iisang dyos lang ang allah ninyo

pero bakit we ang ginamit na salita parang lalabas sang-ayon na kayo sa aming mga kristyano na ang dyos ay Elohim o Plural Suffix

Botbot ito ang bente singko, bili ka lang ng kausap kasi binababoy mo ang forum dito.

harballah wrote:

Hay naku common sense at dagdagan ng logic, ang linaw ng sabi ng Allah sa banal na Quran kaya huwag mong ikumpara sa aral ninyo kay Pablo, ang aral namin sa Quran ay siyang aral noong panahon ni Moses.

Chapter 112:


In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only;
2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;
3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;
4. And there is none like unto Him.

harballah wrote:

Kung Islam po kayo Gin ay mauunawaan mo kung bakit ginagamit diyan ang "WE" pero kung hindi po ay mahihirapan nga kayong intindihin, atsaka nakita mo naman ang sabi ng Allah sa suratul Ikhlas, doon pa lang ay tapos na ang usapin kasi hindi iyan 1+1+1=1.

Eh, di ipaliwanag n'yo po sa mas madaling paraan na maiintindihan ng hindi Muslim na kagaya ko...

Here is a response by a sheikh on this question:

Question :

Why does the Quran use the term "we" in its ayats?

Many non-believers believe that this may be in reference to Jesus?


Answer :

Praise be to Allaah.

It is a feature of literary style in Arabic that a person may refer to himself by the pronoun nahnu (we) for respect or glorification. He may also use the word ana (I), indicating one person, or the third person huwa (he). All three styles are used in the Qur’an, where Allaah addresses the Arabs in their own tongue. (Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 4/143).

“Allaah, may He be glorified and exalted, sometimes refers to Himself in the singular, by name or by use of a pronoun, and sometimes by use of the plural, as in the phrase (interpretation of the meaning): ‘Verily, We have given you a manifest victory” [al-Fath 48:1], and other similar phrases. But Allaah never refers to Himself by use of the dual, because the plural refers to the respect that He deserves, and may refer to His names and attributes, whereas the dual refers to a specific number (and nothing else), and He is far above that.” (Al-‘Aqeedah al-Tadmuriyyah by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah, p. 75).

These words, innaa (“Verily We”) and nahnu (“We”), and other forms of the plural, may be used by one person speaking on behalf of a group, or they may be used by one person for purposes of respect or glorification, as is done by some monarchs when they issue statements or decrees in which they say “We have decided…” etc. [This is known in English as “The Royal We” – Translator]. In such cases, only one person is speaking but the plural is used for respect. The One Who is more deserving of respect than any other is Allaah, may He be glorified and exalted, so when He says in the Qur’an innaa (“Verily We”) and nahnu (“We”), it is for respect and glorification, not to indicate plurality of numbers. If an aayah of this type is causing confusion, it is essential to refer to the clear, unambiguous aayaat for clarification, and if a Christian, for example, insists on taking ayaat such as “Verily, We: it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e., the Qur’an)” [al-Hijr 15:9 – interpretation of the meaning] as proof of divine plurality, we may refute this claim by quoting such clear and unambiguous aayaat as (interpretation of the meanings): “And your god is One God, there is none who has the right to be worshipped but He, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful” [al-Baqarah 2:163] and “Say: He is Allaah, the One” [al-Ikhlaas 112:1] – and other aayaat which can only be interpreted in one way. Thus confusion will be dispelled for the one who is seeking the truth. Every time Allaah uses the plural to refer to Himself, it is based on the respect and honour that He deserves, and on the great number of His names and attributes, and on the great number of His troops and angels.” (Reference: Al-‘Aqeedah al-Tadmuriyyah by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah, p. 109). And Allaah knows best.

Islam Q&A

Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid (www.islam-qa.com)

I see...

reborn wrote:Here is a response by a sheikh on this question:

Question :

Why does the Quran use the term "we" in its ayats?

Many non-believers believe that this may be in reference to Jesus?


Answer :

Praise be to Allaah.

It is a feature of literary style in Arabic that a person may refer to himself by the pronoun nahnu (we) for respect or glorification. He may also use the word ana (I), indicating one person, or the third person huwa (he). All three styles are used in the Qur’an, where Allaah addresses the Arabs in their own tongue. (Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 4/143).

“Allaah, may He be glorified and exalted, sometimes refers to Himself in the singular, by name or by use of a pronoun, and sometimes by use of the plural, as in the phrase (interpretation of the meaning): ‘Verily, We have given you a manifest victory” [al-Fath 48], and other similar phrases. But Allaah never refers to Himself by use of the dual, because the plural refers to the respect that He deserves, and may refer to His names and attributes, whereas the dual refers to a specific number (and nothing else), and He is far above that.” (Al-‘Aqeedah al-Tadmuriyyah by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah, p. 75).

These words, innaa (“Verily We”) and nahnu (“We”), and other forms of the plural, may be used by one person speaking on behalf of a group, or they may be used by one person for purposes of respect or glorification, as is done by some monarchs when they issue statements or decrees in which they say “We have decided…” etc. [This is known in English as “The Royal We” – Translator]. In such cases, only one person is speaking but the plural is used for respect. The One Who is more deserving of respect than any other is Allaah, may He be glorified and exalted, so when He says in the Qur’an innaa (“Verily We”) and nahnu (“We”), it is for respect and glorification, not to indicate plurality of numbers. If an aayah of this type is causing confusion, it is essential to refer to the clear, unambiguous aayaat for clarification, and if a Christian, for example, insists on taking ayaat such as “Verily, We: it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e., the Qur’an)” [al-Hijr 15 – interpretation of the meaning] as proof of divine plurality, we may refute this claim by quoting such clear and unambiguous aayaat as (interpretation of the meanings): “And your god is One God, there is none who has the right to be worshipped but He, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful” [al-Baqarah 2] and “Say: He is Allaah, the One” [al-Ikhlaas 112] – and other aayaat which can only be interpreted in one way. Thus confusion will be dispelled for the one who is seeking the truth. Every time Allaah uses the plural to refer to Himself, it is based on the respect and honour that He deserves, and on the great number of His names and attributes, and on the great number of His troops and angels.” (Reference: Al-‘Aqeedah al-Tadmuriyyah by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah, p. 109). And Allaah knows best.

Islam Q&A

Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid ([url=http://www.islam-qa.com)

www.islam-qa.com)[/quote[/url]]

Reborn thanks for your nice post pero baka diyan pupunta ang usapin kasi ang gusto ko munang ipasagot sa thread starter ay ito.

Sana masagot na ito para sa ganoon ay masara na ang usapin dito kasi propaganda lang ang habol ng thread starter.

harballah wrote:

Kung sa tingin mo ay marami ang Diyos dahil nabanggit ang "WE" bakit detalyado ang sinabi niya sa suratul Ikhlas, ikaw ba payag at tatanggapin mong iyong plural ay royalty respect ?

Isa lang ang sagot diyan sa tanong mo dahil ang Allah lamang ang siyang huhusga sa masama at gagantimpala sa mabuti.


4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

Ang linaw-linaw ano po, hindi Muslim ang huhusga kasi walang kakayahan ang Muslim na humusga sa araw ng paghuhukom.

Ngayon ano paba ang gusto mong itanong kasi paikot-ikot ka lang sa maling thread mo na ito, mas maganda ay magtanong muna kayo sa higit na nakakaalam sa relihiyon ito.

Tingnan mo iyong redmark, ang linaw kung sino ang gagantimpala sa paraiso, Muslim ba ang makakagawa niyan.

Kaya nga dapat common sense at dagdagan mo ng logic.

“We”), it is for respect and glorification, not to indicate plurality of numbers

hanep pala po no

sa english grammar pa pag sinabi bang we sign of respect ba yun?

BibleBot wrote:“We”), it is for respect and glorification, not to indicate plurality of numbers

hanep pala po no

sa english grammar pa pag sinabi bang we sign of respect ba yun?

Ayan nasagot ka na ng inilatag ni reborn, ngayon kung tanggap mo o hindi ay hindi na importante ang importante ngayon ay kung naunawaan mo ba itong sagot ko sa thread topic mo.

Nauunawaan mo ba iyan na hindi ang Muslim ang paparusa kundi ang Allah at siya rin ang magbibigay ng gantimpala at hindi ang mga Muslim.

harballah wrote:

Kung sa tingin mo ay marami ang Diyos dahil nabanggit ang "WE" bakit detalyado ang sinabi niya sa suratul Ikhlas, ikaw ba payag at tatanggapin mong iyong plural ay royalty respect ?

Isa lang ang sagot diyan sa tanong mo dahil ang Allah lamang ang siyang huhusga sa masama at gagantimpala sa mabuti.


4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

Ang linaw-linaw ano po, hindi Muslim ang huhusga kasi walang kakayahan ang Muslim na humusga sa araw ng paghuhukom.

Ngayon ano paba ang gusto mong itanong kasi paikot-ikot ka lang sa maling thread mo na ito, mas maganda ay magtanong muna kayo sa higit na nakakaalam sa relihiyon ito.

Tingnan mo iyong redmark, ang linaw kung sino ang gagantimpala sa paraiso, Muslim ba ang makakagawa niyan.

Kaya nga dapat common sense at dagdagan mo ng logic.

harballah wrote:

Ayan nasagot ka na ng inilatag ni reborn, ngayon kung tanggap mo o hindi ay hindi na importante ang importante ngayon ay kung naunawaan mo ba itong sagot ko sa thread topic mo.

Nauunawaan mo ba iyan na hindi ang Muslim ang paparusa kundi ang Allah at siya rin ang magbibigay ng gantimpala at hindi ang mga Muslim.

harballah kahit grade 4 lang ang tinapos ko at isa lamang hamak na nagkakatay ng baboy sa palengke maalam pa rin ako sa gramarya ng wikang inglis

ako yata ang matalino sa ropor

kung sasanguniin ba natin ang english grammar yung salitang we ba ay pantukoy sa respect

sige na kasi umaasa ka lang sa plagiarize na sagot ni moja-moja eh

Botbot, ikaw ba ay tumatanggap ng sagot o gusto mo lang talagang ilapat ang Quran sa turo ni Pablo sa inyo, nagpost na si reborn at naglatag ako ng talata patungkol sa usapin mo dito kung sino ang huhusga at papatay kamo sa disbeliever pero patuloy ka parin nambababoy sa thread mong ito, hindi kaya dahil sabi mo ay grade four ka lang ay pang-elementarya lang ang naabot ng memorya mo at hindi kayang makipagtalakayan sa edukadong tulad namin.

Atsaka bakit mo naidawit iyong moja-moja, sino ba siya?

Pansinin mo naman itong post ko para hindi masayang kaya nga minsan gusto kung sundin ang payo ng kapatid ko na si jewel na huwag ng maglatag ng quran verse kasi sayang lang.

harballah wrote:
Kung sa tingin mo ay marami ang Diyos dahil nabanggit ang "WE" bakit detalyado ang sinabi niya sa suratul Ikhlas, ikaw ba payag at tatanggapin mong iyong plural ay royalty respect ?

Isa lang ang sagot diyan sa tanong mo dahil ang Allah lamang ang siyang huhusga sa masama at gagantimpala sa mabuti.


4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

Ang linaw-linaw ano po, hindi Muslim ang huhusga kasi walang kakayahan ang Muslim na humusga sa araw ng paghuhukom.

Ngayon ano paba ang gusto mong itanong kasi paikot-ikot ka lang sa maling thread mo na ito, mas maganda ay magtanong muna kayo sa higit na nakakaalam sa relihiyon ito.

Tingnan mo iyong redmark, ang linaw kung sino ang gagantimpala sa paraiso, Muslim ba ang makakagawa niyan.

Kaya nga dapat common sense at dagdagan mo ng logic.

harballah ang argumento mo kasi ginagamit ang salitang we bilang royalty respect

eto ang tanong ko sayo sa gramarya ba ng wikang inglis tama bang gamitin ang salitang we bilang noun na pang-respeto

BibleBot wrote:harballah ang argumento mo kasi ginagamit ang salitang we bilang royalty respect

eto ang tanong ko sayo sa gramarya ba ng wikang inglis tama bang gamitin ang salitang we bilang noun na pang-respeto

Botbot magbasa lang po kayo hanepo! kasi mahirap talagang makipag-usap sa taong umamin na grade four lang ang inabot niya, gumagawa ng thread pero hindi iyong nasa thread ang gustong pag-usapan, ,sinagot sa baling paksa niya sa thread pero ayaw naman tumanggap ng sagot, sayang ang panahon sa inyo.

Basta ang sagot sa thread mong ito ay nandiyan na.

4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

Magpaturo ka lang sa tatay at nanay mo.

nasa sinulid po ang pinaguusapan natin

kasi yung salitang we na iyon na tinutukoy sa surah ay may kinalaman sa pamagat ng paksa

sa gramarya ba ng english respect noun ba ang salitang we?

sana sumagot naman at wag mang-insulto kasi tanggap ko naman na grade 4 lang tinapos ko pero maalam naman ako sa teyolohiya

Subukan mo naman sumagot botbot at hindi kita iniinsulto sa pagiging grade four mo kasi ikaw mismo ang nagsabing grade four ka at mangangatay ng baboy, hindi po ako ang nagsabi kaya nga naisip ko lang na baka dahil nasa elementarya ka kaya hindi mo naabot ang talakayan dito.

Ang linaw ng thread topic mo na ang sagot ay inilatag ko na dito.

harballah wrote:Basta ang sagot sa thread mong ito ay nandiyan na.

4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

harballah wrote:Subukan mo naman sumagot botbot at hindi kita iniinsulto sa pagiging grade four mo kasi ikaw mismo ang nagsabing grade four ka at mangangatay ng baboy, hindi po ako ang nagsabi kaya nga naisip ko lang na baka dahil nasa elementarya ka kaya hindi mo naabot ang talakayan dito.

Ang linaw ng thread topic mo na ang sagot ay inilatag ko na dito.

sabi mo kasi kaya salitang we ang ginamit pala sa royalty respect

kaso di mo naman sinagot kung nasa rule ba ng english grammar na gamitin ang we bilang respect noun

Naglatag na si reborn patungkol diyan sa "WE" na naglalaro sa utak mo, ito muna ang sagutin mo at huwag kang paikot-ikot botbot, pakisagot lang po ang sagot basi sa inilatag mong thread.

harballah wrote:Basta ang sagot sa thread mong ito ay nandiyan na.

4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening

harballah wrote:Naglatag na si reborn patungkol diyan sa "WE" na naglalaro sa utak mo, ito muna ang sagutin mo at huwag kang paikot-ikot botbot, pakisagot lang po ang sagot basi sa inilatag mong thread.

[/color]

bakit hindi mo sagutin tutal naman nananahimik na si reborn kasi mahirap talaga lalo na kung kopya sa websayt ang sagot

Kailan mo ba talaga balak na sagutin ang inilatag ko dito.

Harballah wrote:Isa lang ang sagot diyan sa tanong mo dahil ang Allah lamang ang siyang huhusga sa masama at gagantimpala sa mabuti.


4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

Ang linaw-linaw ano po, hindi Muslim ang huhusga kasi walang kakayahan ang Muslim na humusga sa araw ng paghuhukom.

Ngayon ano paba ang gusto mong itanong kasi paikot-ikot ka lang sa maling thread mo na ito, mas maganda ay magtanong muna kayo sa higit na nakakaalam sa relihiyon ito.

Tingnan mo iyong redmark, ang linaw kung sino ang gagantimpala sa paraiso, Muslim ba ang makakagawa niyan.

Kaya nga dapat common sense at dagdagan mo ng logic.

Huwag mong kalimutan na iyan ang tunay na paksa basi sa inilatag mong usapin dito.

bakit di ka na lang sumagot tulungan mo na lang si reborn sa pagsagot

BibleBot wrote:bakit di ka na lang sumagot tulungan mo na lang si reborn sa pagsagot

Nasagot kana botbot ni reborn at malinaw ang nakasulat doon pero ang problema mo ay hindi mo masagot ang post ko dito basi sa inilatag mong thread topic kung sino ba ang paparusa ang Allah ba o ang mga Muslim.

Harballah wrote:Isa lang ang sagot diyan sa tanong mo dahil ang Allah lamang ang siyang huhusga sa masama at gagantimpala sa mabuti.


4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

Ang linaw-linaw ano po, hindi Muslim ang huhusga kasi walang kakayahan ang Muslim na humusga sa araw ng paghuhukom.

Ngayon ano paba ang gusto mong itanong kasi paikot-ikot ka lang sa maling thread mo na ito, mas maganda ay magtanong muna kayo sa higit na nakakaalam sa relihiyon ito.

Tingnan mo iyong redmark, ang linaw kung sino ang gagantimpala sa paraiso, Muslim ba ang makakagawa niyan.

Kaya nga dapat common sense at dagdagan mo ng logic.

Iyan ang sagot ng mga Muslim na tulad ko at hindi paligoy-ligoy at nambababoy ng thread.

paanong nasagot eh malabo nga ang premise nya kung bakit we ang ginamit bilang royalty respect gayung hindi naman ito sinusuportahan ng tamang gramarya

sana po wag magpaligoy-ligoy sagutin po ninyo yun

BibleBot wrote:paanong nasagot eh malabo nga ang premise nya kung bakit we ang ginamit bilang royalty respect gayung hindi naman ito sinusuportahan ng tamang gramarya

sana po wag magpaligoy-ligoy sagutin po ninyo yun

Alam mo botbot nasasabi mong hindi nasagot kasi nga hindi mo matanggap ang sagot diyan, pero sa ngayon gusto ko munang ikaw naman ang sumagot sa post ko kasi masyado ka ng nagkakalat dito.

Ayaw mo bang i-refute ito?

Harballah wrote:Isa lang ang sagot diyan sa tanong mo dahil ang Allah lamang ang siyang huhusga sa masama at gagantimpala sa mabuti.


4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

Ang linaw-linaw ano po, hindi Muslim ang huhusga kasi walang kakayahan ang Muslim na humusga sa araw ng paghuhukom.

Ngayon ano paba ang gusto mong itanong kasi paikot-ikot ka lang sa maling thread mo na ito, mas maganda ay magtanong muna kayo sa higit na nakakaalam sa relihiyon ito.

Tingnan mo iyong redmark, ang linaw kung sino ang gagantimpala sa paraiso, Muslim ba ang makakagawa niyan.

Kaya nga dapat common sense at dagdagan mo ng logic.

teka sabi ni reborn at ikaw na ang salitang we ay ginagamit bilang paggalang o respect

eto ang tanong ko kasi malabo ang premise ninyo eh

paano ninyo nasabing ang salitang we ay isang respect noun?

meron po ba kayong maipakita na rules of grammar bilang patunay na ang salitang we ay respect noun?

pakisagot na po

Hintayin mo si reborn baka patulan ka niya sa pagpapaikot mo dito sa thread mo, sa ngayon ay nais kung sagutin mo ang post ko about sa thread topic mo dito.

Harballah wrote:Harballah wrote:Isa lang ang sagot diyan sa tanong mo dahil ang Allah lamang ang siyang huhusga sa masama at gagantimpala sa mabuti.


4:56. Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.

4:57 But those who believe and do deeds of righteousness, We shall soon admit to Gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal home: Therein shall they have companions pure and holy: We shall admit them to shades, cool and ever deepening.

Ang linaw-linaw ano po, hindi Muslim ang huhusga kasi walang kakayahan ang Muslim na humusga sa araw ng paghuhukom.

Ngayon ano paba ang gusto mong itanong kasi paikot-ikot ka lang sa maling thread mo na ito, mas maganda ay magtanong muna kayo sa higit na nakakaalam sa relihiyon ito.

Tingnan mo iyong redmark, ang linaw kung sino ang gagantimpala sa paraiso, Muslim ba ang makakagawa niyan.

Kaya nga dapat common sense at dagdagan mo ng logic.

Hindi kita papatakasin dahil nakikita ko na gusto mong takasan ang post kung ito.